PCP and Septins govern the polarized organization of the actin cytoskeleton during convergent extension.

Convergent extension (CE) requires the coordinated action of the planar cell polarity (PCP) proteins1,2 and the actin cytoskeleton,3,4,5,6 but this relationship remains incompletely understood. For example, PCP signaling orients actomyosin contractions, yet actomyosin is also required for the polarized localization of PCP proteins.7,8 Moreover, the actin-regulating Septins play key roles in actin organization9 and are implicated in PCP and CE in frogs, mice, and fish5,6,10,11,12 but execute only a subset of PCP-dependent cell behaviors. Septin loss recapitulates the severe tissue-level CE defects seen after core PCP disruption yet leaves overt cell polarity intact.5 Together, these results highlight the general fact that cell movement requires coordinated action by distinct but integrated actin populations, such as lamella and lamellipodia in migrating cells13 or medial and junctional actin populations in cells engaged in apical constriction.14,15 In the context of Xenopus mesoderm CE, three such actin populations are important, a superficial meshwork known as the "node-and-cable" system,4,16,17,18 a contractile network at deep cell-cell junctions,6,19 and mediolaterally oriented actin-rich protrusions, which are present both superficially and deeply.4,19,20,21 Here, we exploited the amenability of the uniquely "two-dimensional" node and cable system to probe the relationship between PCP proteins, Septins, and the polarization of this actin network. We find that the PCP proteins Vangl2 and Prickle2 and Septins co-localize at nodes, and that the node and cable system displays a cryptic, PCP- and Septin-dependent anteroposterior (AP) polarity in its organization and dynamics.

Vinculin is essential for sustaining normal levels of endogenous forces at cell-cell contacts.

Transmission of cell-generated (i.e., endogenous) tension at cell-cell contacts is crucial for tissue shape changes during morphogenesis and adult tissue repair in tissues such as epithelia. E-cadherin-based adhesions at cell-cell contacts are the primary means by which endogenous tension is transmitted between cells. The E-cadherin-ß-catenin-α-catenin complex mechanically couples to the actin cytoskeleton (and thereby the cell's contractile machinery) both directly and indirectly. However, the key adhesion constituents required for substantial endogenous force transmission at these adhesions in cell-cell contacts are unclear. Due to the role of α-catenin as a mechanotransducer that recruits vinculin at cell-cell contacts, we expected α-catenin to be essential for sustaining normal levels of force transmission. Instead, using the traction force imbalance method to determine the inter-cellular force at a single cell-cell contact between cell pairs, we found that it is vinculin that is essential for sustaining normal levels of endogenous force transmission, with absence of vinculin decreasing the inter-cellular tension by over 50%. Our results constrain the potential mechanical pathways of force transmission at cell-cell contacts and suggest that vinculin can transmit forces at E-cadherin adhesions independent of α-catenin, possibly through ß-catenin. Furthermore, we tested the ability of lateral cell-cell contacts to withstand external stretch and found that both vinculin and α-catenin are essential to maintain cell-cell contact stability under external forces.

α-Catenin-dependent vinculin recruitment to adherens junctions is antagonistic to focal adhesions.

Vinculin is a protein found in both focal adhesions (FAs) and adherens junctions (AJs) which regulates actin connectivity to these structures. Many studies have demonstrated that mechanical perturbations of cells result in enhanced recruitment of vinculin to FAs and/or AJs. Likewise, many other studies have shown "cross-talk" between FAs and AJs. Vinculin itself has been suggested to be a probable regulator of this adhesion cross-talk. In this study we used MDCK as a model system of epithelia, developing cell lines in which vinculin recruitment was reduced or enhanced at AJs. Careful analysis of these cells revealed that perturbing vinculin recruitment to AJs resulted in a reduction of detectable FAs. Interestingly the cross-talk between these two structures was not due to a limited pool of vinculin, as increasing expression of vinculin did not rescue FA formation. Instead, we demonstrate that vinculin translocation between AJs and FAs is necessary for actin cytoskeleton rearrangements that occur during cell migration, which is necessary for large, well-formed FAs. Last, we show using a wound assay that collective cell migration is similarly hindered when vinculin recruitment is reduced or enhanced at AJs, highlighting that vinculin translocation between each compartment is necessary for efficient collective migration.